Time to tax marijuana
[With] budget deficits and a worsening recession, it only makes sense to stop spending money to fight marijuana use and start taxing that use to help balance both state and federal budgets.
By Ted McLaughlin / The Rag Blog / July 19, 2009
California recently thought they had fixed their financial problems on the state level, but they were wrong. The state government is still experiencing a huge shortfall in income. There are some in the state who believe it is time to legalize marijuana and tax it to help solve their financial crises.
Using the quantity of marijuana seized by authorities last year as a guide, it is estimated that the marijuana crop in California last year was worth about $17 billion. Personally, I think that’s a very conservative estimate. But even using the government’s $17 billion figure, that dwarfs any other agricultural crop in the state.
The top tax collector in the state says if they tax marijuana just like they tax liquor, the state could collect taxes worth $1.3 billion. That would solve California’s deficit problem. But California is not the only state with a huge marijuana crop or deficit problems. Most states, especially in the West and South, have large illegal crops of marijuana. Marijuana can even be grown as far north as Alaska, as we found out a few years ago when it was legal for a while there.
Frankly, it is time for the federal government to legalize marijuana. While marijuana alone could not pay off the federal deficit, it could be used to keep that deficit from growing larger. Currently, the federal government is searching for ways to pay for health care reform and a public health insurance system. Why not put a substantial tax on marijuana? It could be taxed even more heavily than alcohol, and most users would gladly pay it. A marijuana tax could pay a substantial portion of health care reform.
The only reason marijuana is illegal is because of many years of government propaganda — most of it either wrong or outright lies. The fact that the government still classes marijuana as though it were a dangerous drug like heroin or cocaine or methamphetamine is ridiculous. The truth is that marijuana is far less dangerous than either alcohol or tobacco — both of which are legal (and should remain so). Furthermore, many many deaths can be attributed to alcohol or tobacco each year in America, while not one death can be attributed to marijuana.
There is a myth that marijuana is a “gateway” drug — that users of marijuana will go on to use more dangerous drugs. That is simply a lie. If it has even a small gateway effect, it is because a user quickly learns the government has been lying to him/her about marijuana use. They then wonder what other drugs the government has been lying about. Separating marijuana from the other drugs and legalizing it will kill this small gateway effect caused by government lies.
Millions of honest hard-working tax-paying Americans use marijuana on a fairly regular basis. They do this even though the plant is illegal. They don’t break any other laws. They don’t steal from or hurt any other people. Why do we want to criminalize and punish these people? They just want to make their own choices about their own lives. For some marijuana is a stress-reliever or a sleeping aid, while others just use it recreationally.
Criminalizing and punishing these people actually hurts our country without accomplishing anything positive. We must not only pay for their incarceration, but once they have a record and have difficulty finding work because of that, they are much more likely to actually participate in criminal behavior — behavior that actually would be harmful to persons or property.
Our attempt to enforce this second prohibition has been as big a failure as the first one was. In the twenties and thirties, we found that people would use alcohol whether it was legal or not. Making it illegal simply gave organized crime a big payday — so big they were killing each other to control it. Marijuana (and other drug) prohibition has done the same. People are going to smoke marijuana whether it is legal or not. Isn’t it time to take this money out of the hands of the drug gangs?
We have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on the so-called “war on drugs,” and it’s been like throwing that money away because nothing has been accomplished. The drug war has been an abysmal failure, and anyone thinking clearly can see that. A good start to fixing this problem would be the legalization of marijuana. We might even find fewer people willing to try the illegal drugs if marijuana were legal.
In a time of budget deficits and a worsening recession, it only makes sense to stop spending money to fight marijuana use and start taxing that use to help balance both state and federal budgets.
[Rag Blog contributor Ted McLaughlin also posts at jobsanger, an excellent Texas political blog.]
See the 2004 economic analysis of the potential economic impact of legal regulation and taxation of cannabis commerce in ALASKA at my website for a glimpse of the much vaster and more beneficial impact it could have in Big Prison states such as California!
The Herbinator has got the right idea, and most Californians support it.
Oh — one error in the article — pot IS legal in Alaska and has been since the early 70s. Adults may possess and grow up to 4 oz. of weed, and many do. This has been upheld repeatdly by AK's Supreme Court despite threats of cut-offs of US military payrolls (ha ha ha).
Of course these are mostly indoor crops due to the short growing season. What is still illegal in AK is cannabis
Sorry about the error Mariann. I thought the Republicans had changed that recently.
Off topic, but…
An older post mentioned Jubilee Hall:
http://theragblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/retro-to-august-13-1989.html
I was part of the light show at Jubilee Hall circa 1969-1970. If anybody has any photos from that era at Jubilee Hall, I would love to see them.
Thanks…
If you Google this topic and add Walter Cronkite's name to it, you'll find he felt the war on drugs was as futile and wasteful as the war in Vietnam…….
Ted — The Republicans in AK that I met didn’t really have a problem with legal cannabis — they are a pretty laissez-faire bunch, in the main. The feds, on the other hand, keep trying to change the situation, but they are up against several serious obstacles that have so far held firm:
1. Alaska’s State Constitution includes a privacy clause that is much stronger than anything in those of the other 49 states’; this gives the Supreme Court of AK a solid place to hang their decisions.
2. Federal pressure to recrim comes mostly in the form of financial treats, and AK is the state most heavily dependent on the federal teat. However, this is in large part due to US military installations there, and even the most paranoid AKans are figuring out that Uncle Sugar has no intention of abandoning the northern approaches to those pesky Russians, Chinese, and/or North Koreans. The threats are empty, like when your Mom would say, “You rotten kids, wait until your Father gets home!”
3. Finally despite their supposed conservatism and overt Republicanism as a group, Alaska is chock-full of strong political parties of all kinds; AKans like vigorous political debate and are pretty good at both participating in and decoding it; and you have to be a little bit wild and crazy to live in the Great State and call yourself an Alaskan. They have a much stronger state identity even than us Texans, give a bit rat’s ass what happens in the “Lower 48” (betcha less attention paid there to recent celeb deaths than anywhere else in world!), and underneath it all have self-images as rugged individualists, including the part about letting other people also do their own thing as long as it doesn’t hurt you.
They tend to be overly-loyal at times, and their choice of elected officials, from the Murkowskis to Mrs. Palin, shows it. But when it comes to personal liberties, Alaska walks the walk.
‘scuse typos — that was a BIG rat’s ass, and MY Mama said WE were rotten kids
Is that picture from your garden?