Porn Flick Screening at U-Md. Still On, as Is Funding Threat
By Maria Glod / April 5, 2009
Neither side is prepared to lay down its sword.
University of Maryland students — protesting what they see as an intrusion by Big Brother — are planning to defy authority and screen a hard-core porn movie in the name of free speech and academic freedom.
“What we’re upset about is somebody is trying to control what goes on on campus. This is symbolic,” said Liz Ciavolino, a sophomore who is active in the group Feminism Without Borders.
In response, one conservative state legislator revived his threat: If the porn flick is shown on campus, the university might just kiss some state dollars goodbye.
A university spokesman declined to comment last night.
The tale of the scheduled screening of “Pirates II: Stagnetti’s Revenge” has roiled the university’s flagship campus and hit newspapers as far away as Australia.
The movie was initially to be shown in the student union last night. But university officials canceled it after Sen. Andrew P. Harris (R-Baltimore County) introduced a bill to withhold state funding from any public university that allowed the screening of a triple-X film.
The fight might have ended there. But some students, adamant that state lawmakers were practicing censorship, have launched plans to show the 2 1/2 -hour movie on campus tomorrow night, the Baltimore Sun first reported. The Student Power Party, a slate of campus leaders, has reserved a lecture room.
A discussion about free speech will precede the movie.
“It’s not about porn at all,” said Kenton Stalder, a junior helping to arrange the screening. “The content doesn’t matter. It’s the precedent of a legislator pulling funding for an entire university based on an issue of morality.”
Harris, who says that X-rated belly dancers and pirates have no place in a public university, is not backing down, either. He withdrew his initial amendment to withhold funds from the operating budget but said he would consider renewing his protest as lawmakers take up the capital budget in coming weeks.
University officials “should stop any showing of it right now until a clear policy is developed by the university regarding the conditions under which a triple-X-rated, hard-core pornography movie will be shown on campus,” Harris said. He said that policy should consider “the dangers of pornography, the detrimental effect on women and families, and the addictive nature of pornography.”
The movie, produced by Digital Playground, has been marketed to colleges and has been shown at several across the country without major controversy. The Fresno Bee reported that an overflow crowd was turned away for lack of space during a recent screening at the University of California Davis.
Sen. Jamie B. Raskin (D-Montgomery), a professor of constitutional law at American University, said he has never watched a porn film. But he said state lawmakers have no place dictating which movies are shown on campus.
“Pornographers and censors thrive on one another,” Raskin said. “I would hope that Sen. Harris would be content with having gotten the pornographers hundreds of thousands of dollars in free publicity for the movie and would leave well enough alone. They could not have paid for the publicity they got on TV and in newspapers.”
[Staff writer John Wagner contributed to this report.]
Source / Washington Post
Students at the University of Teas at Austin fought this battle in the mid-1960s, and again in the early 70s — as long as state lawmakers control universities’ pursestrings, this kind of nonsense will continue from time to time.
Good! A rousing springtime free speech fight is the very best thing for stimulating student activism, and a visceral understanding of just what “Freedom of Assembly” means.
“Freedom: Some Assembly Required!” (Bumper stickers available at Cafe Press, order now in plenty of time for Memorial Day!)